Sunday Reading : Bonfire

 We celebrate festivals with immense joy and excitement, but in every region the methods are different. Holi, the fun-filled and messy festival of colours is what we Indian love to celebrate with our hearts wide-open. We don’t care about getting dirty because it is how Holi is meant to be celebrated. But there's Holika Dahan also. Holika Dahan is a festival celebrated one day before the festival of colours, Holi. It is celebrated as a festival of victory of good over evil and a triumph of a true devotee. There are many legends associated with this festival. One of the most significant legends is the story of Prahlad and his aunt, Holika.

                  Have you ever tried to find out about any other similar festival like Holika Dahan, in this blog I'm going to write about just like our country India, how many other countries celebrate the festival of Bonfire which we call it Holika Dahan. 

Guy Fawkes Night (Bonfire Night) - England:



Guy Fawkes Day, also called Bonfire Night, celebrated on November 5, commemorating the failure of the Gunpowder Plot of 1605. 

The Gunpowder Plot conspirators, led by Robert Catesby, were zealous Roman Catholics enraged at King James I for refusing to grant greater religious tolerance to Catholics. They planned to blow up the Houses of Parliament (Palace of Westminster) during the state opening of Parliament, intending to kill the king and members of Parliament in order to clear the way to reestablishing Catholic rule in England. The plan failed when the conspirators were betrayed. One of them, Guy Fawkes, was taken into custody the evening before the attack, in the cellar where the explosives to be used were stashed. The other conspirators were all either killed resisting capture or—like Fawkes—tried, convicted, and executed. In the aftermath, Parliament declared November 5 a national day of thanksgiving, and the first celebration of it took place in 1606. 

Today Guy Fawkes Day is celebrated in the United Kingdom, and in a number of countries that were formerly part of the British Empire, with parades, fireworks, bonfires, and food. Straw effigies of Fawkes are tossed on the bonfire, as are—in more recent years in some places—those of contemporary political figures. Traditionally, children carried these effigies, called “Guys,” through the streets in the days leading up to Guy Fawkes Day and asked passersby for “a penny for the guy,” often reciting rhymes associated with the occasion, the best known of which dates from the 18th century. 

Daizenji Tamataregu Shrine’s “Oniyo” - Fukuoka, Japan. 



Daizenji Tamataregu Shrine’s “Oniyo” is a festival with tradition of more than 1,600 years and it is also one of Japan’s Three Major Fire Festivals! Its purpose is to banish evil spirits from the town and grant luck, fertility and prosperity.

Shinto Priests purify the town with fire from torches, bonfires and fireworks to drive away evil demons (oni) and ensure good luck and prosperity to the residents. In a tradition that dates back 1900 years, the six neighborhoods surrounding the shrine construct huge torches and parade them between the holy waters of the Arai river and the shrine in order to chase the devil from the town.

Jeongwol Daeboreum Deulbul Festival - Jeju, S. Korea. 



the Fire Festival is a cleansing ritual and the prayer ceremony for luck and good harvest.The island of Jeju was created through a series of volcanic eruptions from 2 million years ago. It is a well-known fact that volcanic eruptions usually have pyroclastic displays, thus it is a fitting celebration for an island that was created by volcanoes. The word daeboreum translates to “great full moon.” During the celebration of the fire festival in Jeju, people from all over flock to the island, braving the cold to climb Mount Halla, a dormant volcano that sits right at the center of Jeju, just to catch the magnificence of the first full moon of the new lunar year. The practice is called “dalmaji.” Some would go as far as the East Coast of South Korea to catch a glimpse of the sun’s first rays at this particular time. Both of these traditions are believed to bring good luck to those who try.


Samhain 2012 - Out of the Darkness - Altoona, Florida, USA. 

More than 500 pagans gather in Florida for the state's largest pagan festival. Running from October 31 to November 4 at Camp Ocala, each day is filled with feasting, rituals, drumming, dancing and live entertainment.The main ritual in 2012 is centred around the "Burning Times" when so-called "witches" were put to death.during this festival, the world of the gods “was believed to be made visible to humankind,” leading to supernatural tricks and trouble; ghosts of the dead and spirits from the Otherworld were also thought to return to the earth during Samhain. To appease deities during this time, sacrifices (generally of crops and animals) were burned in bonfires as a protective measure from from evil otherworldly beings and offerings were left out for other visiting mischievous spirits. Tricks and pranks were often played, but blamed on fairies and spirits during the three-day period when the line between the two worlds blurred. 


Ottery St Mary - Devon, England



Every year, for reasons lost in antiquity, the Flaming Tar Barrels are carried through the streets of Ottery St Mary to the delight of thousands of townsfolk and visitors. Ottery St. Mary is internationally renowned for its Tar Barrels, an old custom said to have originated in the 17th century, and is held each year. Each of Ottery's central public houses sponsors a single barrel. In the weeks prior to the day of the event, November 5th, the barrels are soaked with tar. The barrels are lit outside each of the pubs in turn and once the flames begin to pour out, they are hoisted up onto local people's backs and shoulders.The streets and alleys around the pubs are packed with people, all eager to feel the lick of the barrels flame. 

Sadeh - Iran


Sadeh meaning hundred, is a mid winter feast that was celebrated with grandeur and magnificence in ancient Iran. It was a festivity to honor fire and to defeat the forces of darkness, frost and cold. From Achaemenid times the Iranian calendar had 360 days and was short of 5 days. Ardeshir the first Sassanian king reformed the calendar and 5 days were added at the end. The new calendar receded slowly against the solar year, and the holy days, which with their symbolism were closely linked with the seasons, became gradually divorced from them. The months moved and so did the holy days, to make sure festivals were observed correctly both the old and the new dates were celebrated. The festival celebrated in Yazd till a few decades ago was according to Fasli (seasonal) calendar and in a few villages it was called Hiromba. While the other Zoroastrians celebrated the Sadeh in Bahman. There was confusion earlier in the century as to when it should be celebrated, but most Zoroastrians have adopted the 10th of Bahman as the main event.

In Sassanian times huge bon fires were set up. Priests led the prayers specific to fire ‘Atash Niyayesh’ and performed the correct rituals before it was lit at sunset. People would dance around the fires. Wine an expensive luxury was served communally and like all other Zoroastrian religious ceremonies the occasion would end with fun, merriment and feasts. The most elaborate report of the celebration comes from the 10th century during the reign of Mardavij Zeyari, the ruler of Isfahan. From Iranian origin the Zeyari family did their best to keep the old traditions alive. Huge bon fires were set up on both sides of the ‘Zayandeh Rood’, the main river dividing the city. The fires were contained in specially build metal holders to maintain control. Hundreds of birds were released while carrying little fireballs to light the sky. There were fireworks, clowns, dance and music with lavish feasts of roasted lamb, beef, chicken and other delicacies.









Sunday Reading

 *When God Is a Traveller*



Arundhati Subramaniam

 (wondering about Kartikeya/ Muruga/ Subramania, my namesake)

 Trust the god back from his travels, his voice wholegrain (and chamomile), 

his wisdom neem, his peacock, sweaty-plumed, drowsing in the shadows.

 Trust him who sits wordless on park benches listening to the cries of children fading into the dusk, 

his gaze emptied of vagrancy, his heart of ownership.

Trust him who has seen enough— revolutions, promises, the desperate light of shopping malls, hospital rooms, manifestos, theologies, the iron taste of blood, the great craters in the middle of love. 

Trust him who no longer begrudges his brother his prize, his parents their partisanship. 

Trust him whose race is run, whose journey remains, who stands fluid-stemmed knowing he is the tree that bears fruit, festive with sun.

Trust him who recognizes you— auspicious, abundant, battle-scarred, alive— and knows from where you come. 

Trust the god ready to circle the world all over again this time for no reason at all other than to see it through your eyes.

Harry Potter

 I'm composing this blog on the grounds of a Web Quest task assigned to me by my teacher to know more about the task, CLICK HERE



J.K. Rowling, in full Joanne Kathleen Rowling, pen name of Joanne Rowling, (born July 31, 1965, Yate, near Bristol, England), British author, creator of the popular and critically acclaimed Harry Potter series, about a young sorcerer in training.


The first book in the Harry Potter series, Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone (1997; also published as Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone), was released under the name J.K. Rowling. (Her publisher recommended a gender-neutral pen name; born Joanne Rowling, she used J.K., adding the middle name Kathleen.) The book was an immediate success, appealing to both children, who were its intended audience, and adults. Featuring vivid descriptions and an imaginative story line, it followed the adventures of the unlikely hero Harry Potter, a lonely orphan who discovers that he is actually a wizard and enrolls in the Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. The book received numerous awards, including the British Book Award. Succeeding volumes—Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (1998), Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (1999), Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (2000), Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (2003), and Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (2005)—also were best sellers, available in more than 200 countries and some 60 languages. The seventh and final novel in the series, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, was released in 2007.

Here I have provided information about all the 8 parts :

1) Harry Potter and The Sorcerer’s (Philosopher's) Stone

2) Harry Potter and The Chamber of Secrets

3) Harry Potter and The Prisoner of Azkaban

4) Harry Potter and The Goblet of Fire

5) Harry Potter and The Order of Phoenix

6) Harry Potter and The Half - Blood Prince

7 & 8: Harry Potter and The Deathly Hallows part 1&2

Here's the link of the brief summery and tasks of Harry Potter and friends in all 8 books. CLICK HERE

Click Here to View the Worksheet. 

Click Here to view the web quest worksheet. 





Da Vinci code

Hello Readers, 


I'm writing this blog on the grounds of a task assigned to me by my teacher. To know more about the task CLICK HERE  .


Trailer of the Movie 

                Imagine if one day someone comes to you and says that you are the descendant of a Holy bloodline. What would you do if one day someone comes to you and says that your grandfather was not your real grandfather, he was just your protector? , what would you do if someone questions the very idea of God and the myths around his marriage and his descendants? What would you do when you come to know that you don't like riddles, puzzles and mysterious but you yourself are a key to all the puzzles, riddles and mystery? You wouldn't believe right, yes the same things happen with Sophia. I'm talking about the world famous and one of the most controversial books, DA Vinci Code written by Dan Brown. It's a mystery thriller which revolves around the bloodline of Jesus Christ and Mary Madeleine and it also narrates a completely different and Controversial story of Jesus's relationship with Mary Magdalene and the secret of The Holy Grail. The novel has bloodshed, treachery, puzzles, arts and mystery, so called religious "Gurus" and an Albino monk who in the name of God killed so many people which reminds us of the so called "Bhakts". 


Brown states on his website that his books are not anti-Christian, though he is on a 'constant spiritual journey' himself, and says that his book The Da Vinci Code is simply "an entertaining story that promotes spiritual discussion and debate" and suggests that the book may be used "as a positive catalyst for introspection and exploration of our faith."

"Literature adds to reality, it does not simply describe it. It enriches the necessary competencies that daily life requires and provides; and in this respect, it irrigates the deserts that our lives have already become.    "  

  • C. S. Lewis

Yes I do agree with Brown's statement, thought the reality of Jesus and Mary Magdalena is also questionable, but what Brown did is, that he had given a path to question even the most controversial things of religion. There are so many myths around each and every religion so rather than just blindly following the myths Brown came out with other myths, yes his myths are also doubtful but still he has tried to justify his myths and also made his readers to think beyond the cliché things told by the so called religious leaders. If one studies this book without any biases and being religious and with a mindset to gain spirituality rather than a blind "भक्त" who's sentiment gets hurt whenever someone questions or debates about the very idea of religion and spirituality this books serves as  a positive catalyst for introspection and exploration of our faith.


Although it is obvious that much of what Brown presented in his novel as absolutely true and accurate is neither of those, some of that material is of course essential to the intrigue, and screenwriter Akiva Goldsman has retained the novel's core, the Grail-related material: the sacred feminine, Mary Magdalene's marriage, the Priory of Sion, certain aspects of Leonardo's art, and so on.” How far do you agree with this observation of Norris J. Lacy?


I completely agree with Norris J. Lacy's observation about novel and the screen writing of the movie by Akiva Goldsman but we can consider it as an artistic liberty, and also this book as well as movie created controversy around the world but if one seeks to know about the very idea of God and Spirituality this book can be considered as a study guide for them. The very idea of God is questionable, there is no enough evidence about God, we only have myths and myths can not be considered as reality. Here Brown put  Myth against a Myth with the help of artists like Da Vinci, Issac Newton and he himself states that his book The Da Vinci Code is simply "an entertaining story that promotes spiritual discussion and debate" and suggests that the book may be used "as a positive catalyst for introspection and exploration of our faith."


(If)You have studied ‘Genesis’ (The Bible), ‘The Paradise Lost’ (John Milton) and ‘The Da Vinci Code’ (Dan Brown). Which of the narrative/s seem/s to be truthful? Whose narrative is convincing to the contemporary young mind?


In Genesis a larger narrative gives wrong judgements. When we see gender discourse, it has so many loose tones.  There are so many examples like Eve's birth, the fall of men is because of the women and mainly the whole concept of God and the punishment of Eve and Adam which is highly controversial and partial. These all ideas fail in a larger context or rather we can say in this scientific world. In The Paradise Lost Milton narrates the ideas which are more convincing. The main theme of Paradise Lost by poet John Milton is the rejection of God's Laws. This epic work deals with Satan's rejection of God's Law and Satan's subsequent expulsion to earth where he seeks to ruin Man. Satan is expelled with a third of the angels (now demons) who chose to follow him rather than the God.We find Adam and Eve have more power, they both remain in the center. Where's God standing on the periphery? When we read The Da Vinci code that time we find a new  representation of the painting, relationship between Jesus and Mary, and much more. As we have seen that reality and science has more power to convince the reader. So,  in conclusion we can say that What Milton represents is a fiction which gives a completely different narrative which shows the rebellion against God. As well as what Brown represents is also a fiction which broadens our vision towards choosing spirituality over religion. 


What harm has been done to humanity by the biblical narration or that of Milton’s in The Paradise Lose? What sort of damage does narrative like ‘The Vinci Code’ do to humanity?


"Fiction is the lie through which we tell the truth."

Albert Camus

The narrative of the Bible is highly problematic, Similarly, so many new things are being portrayed in Paradise Lost and in The Da Vinci Code. In the characters of The Paradise Lost,  we find more positive interpretations.  Adam and Eve have more power, how God is partial, the character of Satan and etc.  Most of the narrative is human centric,  which provides humans to think independently. Same way in The Da Vinci code,  we see a representation of Jesus, his marital life,  his family background.  Brown used a fiction against a fiction to find the truth and in my opinion it's a great thing. 


What difference do you see in the portrayal of 'Ophelia' (Kate Winslet) in Kenneth Branagh's Hamlet, 'Elizabeth' (Helena Bonham Carter) in Kenneth Branagh's Mary Shelley's Frankenstein or 'Hester Prynne' (Demi Moore) in Roland Joffé's The Scarlet Letter' or David Yates's 'Harmione Granger' (Emma Watson) in last four Harry Potter films - and 'Sophie Neuve' (Audrey Tautau) in Ron Howard's The Da Vinci Code? How would justify your answer?


In Kenneth Branagh's Hamlet, Ophelia is objectified, there is a long scene of Ophelia and Hamlet making love, and the camera was running on the naked body of Ophelia which was not necessary. Yes we know that they loved each other but does it necessary to show the lovers "nude "? Ophelia becomes only a sex object nothing else. Elizabeth from Frankenstein, she portrayed as she is much more interested in being married to serve the Victor rather than to think independently and do something about herself. Demi Moore’s Hester Prynne is little bit different than Ophelia and Elizabeth as she dares to take a stand for herself or even she is ready to rebel against society, but here also we can find  problems in close up scenes where camera is focused on highlighting intimacy scenes, though they are no needed. In all these physical beauty of women remains at Centre while their intellectuality remains at periphery. While the character portrayal of Sophie is far beyond than this, here the feminine sacredness became central idea, she is portrayed as an independent national thinker who is in her own search of knowledge as well as throughout movie we can’t find a single close up which presents Sophie’s body as to satisfy male gazing ideas. But I have a question on the portrayal of Sophie in the movie as well as in the novel. 


That raises some questions.

 

Is Ron Howard trying to be a goody goody director in the portrayal of Sophie just because she is a descendant of Jesus? Or does he really believe in women empowerment? Is he playing a safe game? 


Do novel / film lead us into critical (deconstructive) thinking about your religion? Can we think of such conspiracy theory about Hindu religious symbols / myths?


Yes of course, even after reading this book and watching this movie my whole perspective changed, when I first heard about this book I considered it as a simply cliché book which tried to make controversy about religion to gain more fame but when I finished the book I get an insight that this book leads to a different path of questioning the so called religious norms. I'm a Muslim and there are so many ideas which are questionable, what we are doing is that we are not questioning, especially whenever it comes to religion. After watching this film and reading the book I tried to deconstruct some religious ideas of Islam. In Islam Namaz is compulsory but it has it's own scientific reasons. Namaz performed at least five times a day, consisting of 40 rakats. Namaz can be regarded as a type of stretching and isometric contractions exercise. I have come across only one movie "Khuda Ke Liye "


which tried to focus on the misinterpretation of religion and negative effects of religion and so called" dharma gurus" on people and especially on youth. We have the myth that during menstruations women are not allowed to go into holy places or in the kitchen. Maybe earlier this idea was manifested to give rest to women as their body became weak during this period as well as it seems ok because earlier women used to do a lot of farming works and household works, that’s why it became necessary for them to take rest. But now we are following it without having any logical reason behind it. 


Have you come across any similar book/movie, which tries to deconstruct accepted notions about Hindu religion or culture and by dismantling it, attempts to reconstruct another possible interpretation of truth?


Yes I have seen two movies OMG and PK which try to deconstruct the accepted notions about Hindu religion or culture and by dismantling it, it also attempts to reconstruct another possible interpretation of truth. In the movie PK,


the director very strongly tries to deconstruct the notions of all religions such as Christianity, Islam and Hinduism but all the things were done by an alien which is quite problematic. While in the movie Oh My God,(OMG!)

God himself comes on earth to help the human Kanjibhai to deconstruct the lies spread by so called "धर्मगुरु ".


When we do traditional reading of the novel ‘The Da Vinci Code’, Robert Langdon, Professor of Religious Symbology, Harvard University emerges as protagonist and Sir Leigh Teabing, a British Historian as antagonist. Who will claim the position of protagonist if we do atheist reading of the novel?



If we do atheist reading of the novel, the position of protagonist and antagonist will change, Sir Leigh Teabing claims the position of protagonist whereas Robert Langdon claims the position of antagonist. In the novel Sir Leigh Teabing, a historian tries to find out evidence in a scientific manner without having faith or fear from religion. He is the one who finds all the evidence as a historical proof to prove in front of the world about the relation between Jesus and Mary Magdalene. While on the other hand Robert Langdon finds the truth of Sarcophagus but he does not reveal to the world. So from this point of view through the atheist reading Leigh Teabing becomes the protagonist of the novel.











 

The Piano and Drums

 "The Piano and the Drums" by Gabriel Okara is a captivating poem that juxtaposes the primal rhythms of jungle drums with the comp...