Mary Shelley's Frankenstein VS Kenneth Branagh's movie Frankenstein

          Mary Shelley's Frankenstein  VS Kenneth Branagh's movie Frankenstein

               I am composing this blog on the grounds of a task given by Dr. Heenaba Zala. CLICK HERE to view the task .

                    Today I am going to discuss about a very interesting novel of  the goth icon ,Mary Shelley  Yes, I'm talking about Frankenstein and the famous movie on Shelley's Frankenstein by Kenneth Branagh, starring Kenneth Branagh as Victor Frankenstein , Robert De Nero as Monster and Helena Bohman Carter as Elizabeth. Frankenstein is considered as one of the early example of science fiction.Mary Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley the writer of famous Gothic novel Frankenstein or The Modern Prometheus wife of famous Romantic poet P.B. Shelley. Mary Shelley wrote her most iconic piece of literature when she was just 18 years old. Shelley's inspiration for Frankenstein came from a nightmare. According to the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography , Frankenstein is "the best known fiction of the Romantic Era" and is one of the earliest examples of science fiction in the history of storytelling, a topic that is up for debate by many readers throughout centuries.

             
                Now about Kenneth Branagh ,the famous Irish born English actor, director and writer , he is master of film adaptations of Shakespearean  plays.His famous movies are Hamlet(1996) , Much Ado About Nothing(1993), Frankenstein (1994)Henry V (1989) ,Othello (1995), As You Like It(2006), Thor (2011), and so on. H e is a genius , the mafia of classic movies.

TRAILER OF THE MOVIE FRANKENSTEIN (1994)BY KENNETH BRANGH:



  PRE VIEWING TASK:


1] What is Gothic scientific fiction?

      Gothic Science fiction is the sub- genre of science fiction . Gothic science fiction have the same atmospheric qualities of Gothic literature but does not dig into the depth of horror ,it takes typical elements of Gothic literature such as  fear , horror, death and gloom, romance and explains them scientifically.

2] What is a frame narrative?

        Frame Narrative is a literary technique were an introductory or main narrative sets the stage either for a more emphasized second narrative or for a set of short stories.The frame story leads readers from a first story into one more other stories within in.

3] What is the point of view of  the author?

         It is very difficult to tell because including Shelley herself there are three more narrators in the novel , first one is the Captain Robert Walton who narrates the story of Victor Frankenstein to his sister Margret Saville , the second narrator is Victor Frankenstein who narrates his story to captain and the third one is the Monster ,who demands to be heard .

4] What are the viewpoints of different characters?

          There are three main characters in the novel , each character has his own point of view or story to tell. Caption tells the story of Frankenstein to his sister  then the point of view shifts to Victor ,who tells about his life and how he came to be wandering in the Arctic then the point of view shifts to Monster .

5] Do you have confusion about the title of the novel ?
        yes i do have confusion about the title of the novel because in the novel the Monster calls Victor his father ,so when we heard the name Frankenstein we can't be sure about which Frankenstein is the story about . 

6] Who do you think is the real monster , the Creator or the  Creation ?

                 According to my point of view Victor is the monster because when he saw the Monster his creation which went horribly wrong rather than destroying him he ran away and the Monster escaped from there and because of the rejection from the society  again and again because of his abnormal look the Monster becomes  rebellion and vows to take revenge and kills so any people who were dear to Victor.

7] What is "Tabula Rasa "?

          According to Merriam Webster dictionary the definition of Tabula Rasa is that the mind in its hypothetical , primary blank or empty state before receiving outside impressions .

8] What is the significance of the subtitle  " Modern Prometheus"?

                        The word Modern Prometheus brings the story of ancient Promethean myth in our minds. The story of  Prometheus is similar to the story of Frankenstein . Prometheus makes man as in the first man out of clay and then makes the big mistake of stealing fire from God so that man can survive.same way Victor creates a man which is kind of questioning the God's power and the creation ,his experiment goes wrong and the abnormal and horrifying Monster was created by him, thus the subtitle 'Modern Prometheus" is significant to Mary Shelley's Frankenstein.

9] Do you think Mary Shelley's Frankenstein stands on the brick of revolutionary changes?

               Yes , i do think that Mary Shelley's Frankenstein stands on the brick of revolutionary changes .Many critics read the novel as a critical response to the Scientific Revolution .

WHILE WATCHING THE MOVIE:

1] How is the beginning and the end of the movie?

              The movie begin with the narration in the voice of Shelly:
           
         " I busied myself to think of a story which would speak to the mysterious fears of our nature and awaken thrilling horror; one to make the reader dread to look around , to curdle the blood and quicken the beating  of the heart"

   which gives us some idea about the movie that movie contains horror and fear. And the end of the movie makes us emotional ,especially the Monster tells the people of the ship that ,"He was my father".

2] Do you feel the effect of horror in the movie?

        Yes , i did feel the effect of horror when i saw the monster and the dead bodies and the way Victor (Kenneth Branagh ) was cutting and stitching the dead bodies during his experiments .

3] What do you think about the character of Monster in the movie?

            The character of Monster in the movie which was played by  Robert De Nero evokes horror, disgust and sometimes pity also. when he was beaten by Felix he becomes sad and he cries this scene evokes sympathy and pity for him . While he kills Elizabeth it evokes great horror.

4] What do you think about the conversation between Victor and Monster ?

                At first when the Monster attacks Victor from behind it makes us like he is going to kill him but instead of killing him he pushed Victor into the ice cave . From the conversation of the Victor and Monster we come to know about Monsters desire for a partner like a normal human being and also when we see Victors expressions we find pity and we feel sorry for both of them.

5] Do you think that some scenes are omitted or replaced by other scene? How is the effect of these changes ?Do you think the director has used appropriate symbols in the movie?

           Yes, some scenes are changed in the movie like in the novel Felix  was not married and living with his father De Lacy and sister Agatha while in the movie it is shown that Felix is married and has two children. The Monster secretly learns english while Felix was teaching his French lover Safie English while in the movie it is shawn  in the Monster learns English while the wife of Fexil was teaching their kids.YES, the director used the appropriate symbol in the movie such as Light, Book, Cross of Jesus.

POST VIEWING TASKS :

1] What is the difference between movie and the novel?

         Kenneth Branagh made some changes in the movie but all over the movie is as interesting as the novel. 

2] Does the movie help you to understand narrative structure of the novel?

    Yes , when i first read the novel i had some questions and doubts .i was little  confused about the characters  and the settings of the novel but after watching the movie all doubts got clear .

3] Do you think the movie is helpful to understand the viewpoint of different characters ?

             Absolutely , there are three narrators  in the novel ,Victor  who narrates  his story to Captain  who narrates Victor's story to his sister Margret Saville and the Monster whose story we come to know about from Victor .so through movie we can understand the viewpoints of different characters very clearly .

4] What do you think about the creation of lady monster in the novel and Elizabeth's look of monster in the movie?

                     While we read a novel we create our own kind of imaginative scenes in our minds but when we see the movie we get a more clear picture of our own imaginative scene or character which helps us to understand the novel more clearly.The look of Elizabeth in the movie evokes horror and pity .

5] Think about Victor's acceptance of Elizabeth and rejection of the Monster.

         We have seen in the movie in also in the novel that Victor was truly and passionately in love with Elizabeth and from the begging when he saw Monster for the first time he got frightened and deserted him .We know that when we love someone truly the height, wight , color does not matter . so because of his passionate  love for her, he accepts the abnormal looking Elizabeth while on the other hand deserted the Monster.

6] Do you think the director is faithful to the novel?

        I can't say that the director is completely faithful to the movie because he made some changes in the movie.


                                                                     THANK YOU...

                      
                           
           
               
           

MATTHEW ARNOLD - TOUCH STONE METHOD

HELLO READERS,

                       



      Today i am going to talk (write) about an English poet and critic MATTHEW ARNOLD and about his essay  THE STUDY OF POETRY. Arnold's literary criticism is closely associated with society and of general life .He was the first critic to declare that people could be consoled ,healed and changed by reading literature.

In  this essay he talked about good poetry and he also introduced TOUCH STONE METHOD .Arnold  is famous for his definition of poetry, "Poetry is the criticism of life". Arnold is sometimes  considered as the third great Victorian Poet along with Tennyson and Robert Browning. From childhood he was surrounded by scholars , his father Thomas Arnold was a headmaster of Rugby School and both his brothers were literary scholars . His brother Tom Arnold was a literary professor and his another brother William Delafield Arnold was a novelist and colonial administrator .some of the notable works of Arnold are DOVER BEACH , THE SCHOLAR GIPSY , THYRSIS .

CHARACTERISTICS OF GOOD POETRY AND CRITICISM:

➤Poetic truth and poetic beauty
➤Truth and seriousness of matter 
➤Critic must be free from all prejudices ,
    personal or historical 
➤Felicity and perfection of matter
➤Natural magic and profoundness 
➤Excellent action and grand style

          we can consider Arnold as an intellectual giant of the Victorian Age .He gives high position to poetry.According to him the best kind of poetry is a criticism of life.He feels that human will find spiritual power and satisfaction in poetry , every field of human thought and action has been influenced by poetry.Even social , cultural and religious thoughts and actions are also influenced by it .Poetry is an interpretation of life.It is criticism of life.It has power to console ,sustain and form humans and at the same it provides delight too. Poetry plays an eminent role in life . it is more important than religion .Arnold says ,

     "In poetry , as a criticism of life under the conditions  fixed for such a criticism by the laws of poetic truth and poetic beauty".

           Arnold further says that, the excellence of poetry lies both in its matter or substance and in its manner of style .Like Wordsworth ,Arnold believes that,

                             "Poetry is the breath and finer spirit of all                                             knowledge".

Truth and seriousness of substance and matter, Felicity and perfection of diction and manner ,natural magic and profoundness use of excellent action and grand style all this aspects of good poetry exhibited in best poets. Poetry is interpretative by having natural moral profundity.we can say that Arnold's views on poetry and criticism are quite mature with logical aspects.

           According to Arnold a critic must be free from all prejudices personal or historical for that he used the words Dis- interestedness or Detachment .Arnold further says that ,                         The business of of criticism is neither to find fault nor                  to display the critic's own learning or influence; it is to                know the best which has been thought and said in the                  world and by using this knowledge to create a current                  of fresh and free thought.

 WHAT IS TOUCH STONE METHOD?

     Touchstone means a fundamental or quite essential part or feature of anything .Arnold's touchstone method is a comparative method of criticism . In order to judge a poet's work properly , a critic should compare it to passages taken from works of great masters of poetry , and that these passages should be applied as touchstone method .Even a single line or selected quotation will serve the purpose. If the other work moves the reader in the same way as these lines and expressions do , then it is really a great work otherwise not.

            The central idea of Arnold's Touchstone method is that he believed that a real classic is a work, which belongs to the class of the very best. It can be recognized by placing it beside the known classics of the world .

           Those known classics can serve as the touchstone by which the merit of contemporary poetic work can be tested.

          TAMER AND HAWK 

                               - Thom Gunn

I thought I was so tough,

But gentled at your hands,

Cannot be quick enough

To fly for you and show

That when I go I go

At your commands.



Even in flight above

I am no longer free:

The habit of your words

Has hooded me.



As formerly, I wheel

I hover and I twist,
But only want the feel,
In my possessive thought,
Of catcher and of caught
Upon your wrist.

You but half civilize,
Taming me in this way.
Through having only eyes
For you I fear to lose,
I lose to keep, and choose
Tamer as prey.

                          

                      Tom Gunn’s Tamer and Hawk is an extended metaphor depicting a powerful, strong, almighty, wild bird of prey a metaphor for Gunn, being controlled by an inferior body a human – his true love. It depicts an image of a bird and its master (with the use of indirect personification). It tells a story of Gunn’s adoration of his ‘Tamer’ and his strong desire to entice his love. It is an effective metaphor because as the poem continues the danger and violence becomes more prominent, especially at the end of the poem. There are three main theme to the poem; 


                    “To fly for you and show”

                      Loyalty “For you I fear to lose”

                     Devotion “You seeled me with your love”

                 The first stanza explains how the Hawk is happy to be domesticated by this person, as he expresses no objection to his situation. He even wants to show off his capabilities in a performance to his Tamer in the hope of impressing him. Gunn idolises his Tamer by portraying him as kind “But gentled at your hands” and being gently powerful “I thought I was so tough”– with the emphases on the second ‘I’ trying to show the Tamer is more powerful than himself, as well as the quotation “Upon your wrist” which depicts the Tamer as somewhat of a godly figure who is in control of another life


                 


                      



     

T. S. ELIOT

Video - 01
What is the difference between practical and new criticism?

Video - 02

Is it possible that one poet can avoid tradition and create or write only with individual talent?

Video - 3

A critic should provide the fresh ideas to author based on individual talent or tradition?

Video - 4

Mind who creates and mind who suffers are different but a poet can create a beautiful and effective poem so can we say that individuality is more significant than tradition?

Video - 5

How can we consider new criticism as the study of new text? What makes it different from other criticism. 

SEER-Source Educational Evaluation Rubric

SEER-Source Educational Evaluation Rubric 


          Today's blog is about a very interesting topic, SEER- Source Educational Evaluation Rubric. Today everything is digital, online payments , online shopping, online studying, digital banking(net banking)and so on, thus everything is digitized but everything has two sides one negative and another one positive. we always heard or read about digital fraud or hacking. just like social media students also do cheating in their studies. Technology and websites are designed to help students to guide and provide help in their studies but nowadays students misuse it they just do CCP(Cut, Copy and Paste) instead of using websites as their study guide they just cut, copy and paste the content provided by the site .this is not good ,but every problem has a solution to avoid plagiarism , there is a website TURNITIN , an American commercial , internet based plagiarism detection service came in action against it. There are some websites which sells education ,which provides wrong or incorrect information to find out about the authenticity, originality , quality, educational values and intentness of this websites TURNITIN helps .

                The source  educational evaluation rubric (SEER)represents the evolution of the critical approach that TURNITIN has adopted and used to categorize websites in their own analysis of students sources .The rubric was designed by academic experts and used by secondary and higher education educators who field- tested the rubric by using it to evaluate over 300 of the most popular  student sources.

     The rubric is built on five criteria :

AUTHORITY : Is the site well regarded, cited                                  and written by experts in the field?

EDUCATIONAL VALUEDoes the site content                                                 help advan educational goals ?

INTENT : Is the site a well- respected source of            content intended to inform users?

ORIGINALITY : Is the site a source of original                                   content and viewpoints ?

QUALITY : Is the site highly vetted with good                          coverage of the topical area?

      Here i tried to find about the originality, educational value , intentness ,authority about some websites which i use often in my study.


1] POETRY FOUNDATION


             It is a non-subscription site that offers authored content and for authority this site  deserves 4,for educational value this site deserves 4 because  one can find  poems of scholar poets  in just one click  and it helps to achieve advance educational goals, for quality  this site receives  4 because this site is highly vetted with good coverage of the topical area and for originality  this site gains  4 because it provides original content .


2] PROJECT GUTENBERG:


      It is a digital library which provides books by scholars and uploaded by the scholars in so many formats such as HTML, PDF, EPUB, MOBI and PLUCKER, so for the authority this site deserves 4 points, one can find so many literary books from this site so for the educational value this site deserves 4 , this site provides good books from well respected sources of content intended to inform the users so for intent this site deserves 4, for originality and quality this site deserves 4 points.


3] JSTOR: 

           It is a digital library for scholars , researchers and students which provides access to more than 12 million academic journal articles, books and primary sources in 75 disciplines by scholars so for the authority this site deserves 4 ,for educational value this site deserves 4 because the site content help advance educational goals of the students, for intent , originality and quality this site deserves 4 point because this site is a well respected source of content intended to inform users ,This site provides source of original content by scholars and this site is highly vetted with good coverage of the topical area.

         

                Here i just did rubric about some websites which i am more familiar with but now i have provided the information about the SEER RUBRIC you can also find out about the authority, quality , educational value , intent and originality of the websites you use the most in your daily studies.we can say that we can do self examination through this website.we should always keep one thing alive in our mind that no one can become successful using shortcuts ,we should use all the websites just for guidance instead of just doing CCP. I hope that my blog provided a useful information to you guys. so from now on no CCP just using websites for guidance to give your subject more ideas.

  

                                                       

NATURE

HELLO READERS ,
          Today i am going to talk about nature, yes NATURE, MOTHER NATURE,PRAKRUTI MATA. 

whenever we heard the word NATURE images of trees ,mountains, chirping of birds, the joyful sound of water comes in our mind. Songs like  धरती सुनहरी अंबर नीला
                                            पंछी, नदिया, पवन के झोकें, 
                                           सावन बरसे तरसे दिल क्‌यूं ना निकले घर से दिल बरखा में भी दिल प्यासा है ये प्यार नहीं तो क्‌या है . 
 represents the magnificent beauty of nature. when we talk about nature how can we forget WORDSWORTH'S DAFFODILS . But here i want to talk about the dual personality of nature. YES, just like humans nature also have dual personality . everyone likes to talk and write about the beauty of nature but very few writes about the other side of the nature. if nature can save us it also have ability to destroy us. Flood , Wildfire,Tsunami are the other side of the nature or we can say that the cruel side of the nature .
Wildfire 



Tsunami 

                              There's a poem by A.K. RAMNUJAN  ,A RIVER in which the poet talked about the dangerous face of the river.

                                           A RIVER 
In Madurai,
city of temples and poets,
who sang of cities and temples,
every summer
a river dries to a trickle
in the sand,
baring the sand ribs,
straw and women's hair
clogging the watergates
at the rusty bars
under the bridges with patches
of repair all over them
the wet stones glistening like sleepy
crocodiles, the dry ones
shaven water-buffaloes lounging in the sun
The poets only sang of the floods.

He was there for a day
when they had the floods.
People everywhere talked
of the inches rising,
of the precise number of cobbled steps
run over by the water, rising
on the bathing places,
and the way it carried off three village houses,
one pregnant woman
and a couple of cows
named Gopi and Brinda as usual.

The new poets still quoted
the old poets, but no one spoke
in verse
of the pregnant woman
drowned, with perhaps twins in her,
kicking at blank walls
even before birth.

He said:
the river has water enough
to be poetic
about only once a year
and then
it carries away
in the first half-hour
three village houses,
a couple of cows
named Gopi and Brinda
and one pregnant woman
expecting identical twins
with no moles on their bodies,
with different coloured diapers
to tell them apart.

The Piano and Drums

 "The Piano and the Drums" by Gabriel Okara is a captivating poem that juxtaposes the primal rhythms of jungle drums with the comp...