SEER-Source Educational Evaluation Rubric
Today's blog is about a very interesting topic, SEER- Source Educational Evaluation Rubric. Today everything is digital, online payments , online shopping, online studying, digital banking(net banking)and so on, thus everything is digitized but everything has two sides one negative and another one positive. we always heard or read about digital fraud or hacking. just like social media students also do cheating in their studies. Technology and websites are designed to help students to guide and provide help in their studies but nowadays students misuse it they just do CCP(Cut, Copy and Paste) instead of using websites as their study guide they just cut, copy and paste the content provided by the site .this is not good ,but every problem has a solution to avoid plagiarism , there is a website TURNITIN , an American commercial , internet based plagiarism detection service came in action against it. There are some websites which sells education ,which provides wrong or incorrect information to find out about the authenticity, originality , quality, educational values and intentness of this websites TURNITIN helps .
The source educational evaluation rubric (SEER)represents the evolution of the critical approach that TURNITIN has adopted and used to categorize websites in their own analysis of students sources .The rubric was designed by academic experts and used by secondary and higher education educators who field- tested the rubric by using it to evaluate over 300 of the most popular student sources.
The rubric is built on five criteria :
⇰AUTHORITY : Is the site well regarded, cited and written by experts in the field?
⇰EDUCATIONAL VALUE: Does the site content help advan educational goals ?
⇰INTENT : Is the site a well- respected source of content intended to inform users?
⇰ORIGINALITY : Is the site a source of original content and viewpoints ?
⇰QUALITY : Is the site highly vetted with good coverage of the topical area?
Here i tried to find about the originality, educational value , intentness ,authority about some websites which i use often in my study.
1] POETRY FOUNDATION :
It is a non-subscription site that offers authored content and for authority this site deserves 4,for educational value this site deserves 4 because one can find poems of scholar poets in just one click and it helps to achieve advance educational goals, for quality this site receives 4 because this site is highly vetted with good coverage of the topical area and for originality this site gains 4 because it provides original content .
2] PROJECT GUTENBERG:
It is a digital library which provides books by scholars and uploaded by the scholars in so many formats such as HTML, PDF, EPUB, MOBI and PLUCKER, so for the authority this site deserves 4 points, one can find so many literary books from this site so for the educational value this site deserves 4 , this site provides good books from well respected sources of content intended to inform the users so for intent this site deserves 4, for originality and quality this site deserves 4 points.
3] JSTOR:
Very well description dear. Keep it up
ReplyDeleteIt's good to give long about any particular subject....well organized try to add some photos so it will give u good out look of your blog...very well.. keep writing...
ReplyDeleteNice
ReplyDeleteWell drafted, good evaluation of websites.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteWell evaluated web resources.
ReplyDeleteWritten good blog 🙂🙂
ReplyDeleteVery well written 👍
ReplyDeleteVery useful information about how to check the quality of any websites. It is useful to others. Good interpretation with example of some websites. Keep it up. 👌👍
ReplyDeleteGood writing
ReplyDelete